NASA Orion ATCS Glycol-Water vs Ammonia
NASA’s choice for Orion’s cooling comes down to safety vs. efficiency. While anhydrous ammonia is an incredible coolant, it’s highly toxic to humans. Since Orion is a crewed capsule, NASA opted for a water-glycol mixture for the internal loops. This keeps the cabin safe from lethal leaks. To handle the heat of deep space, they use a heat exchanger to transfer that energy to an external ammonia loop safely away from the astronauts.
Discover why NASA prioritized crew safety by choosing water-glycol over toxic ammonia for Orion’s internal cooling system. Learn how this ATCS design protects astronauts.
 |
| Glycol-Water vs. Anhydrous Ammonia in Orion ATCS |
Why Did NASA Choose an Active Thermal Control System (ATCS) with Glycol-Water vs. Anhydrous Ammonia for Orion Spacecraft?
Introduction: The Cool Choice for Deep Space
When NASA set out to design the Orion spacecraft for journeys beyond Earth, keeping astronauts and electronics at just the right temperature became a top priority.
Space is an extreme environment—one side of the spacecraft can be freezing cold while the other bakes in sunlight. To manage this, Orion uses an Active Thermal Control System (ATCS) that circulates a special coolant to collect and remove excess heat. But what should that coolant be? NASA had to choose between a glycol-water mixture and anhydrous ammonia, both with proven track records in space.
The decision wasn’t just about which fluid could move heat better; it was about safety, reliability, crew health, and the unique demands of deep space missions.
In this article, we’ll explore why NASA picked glycol-water for Orion’s internal cooling, how it compares to ammonia, and what this means for the future of human spaceflight. Let’s dive into the science—and the story—behind this critical choice.
NASA’s Rationale: Why Glycol-Water for Orion’s ATCS?
NASA’s selection of a glycol-water mixture for Orion’s internal Active Thermal Control System (ATCS) was the result of careful consideration of mission needs, crew safety, and engineering trade-offs.
The primary reason centers on the unique requirements of a crewed spacecraft operating far from Earth. Glycol-water, specifically a propylene glycol and water blend, was chosen because it is non-toxic, relatively easy to handle, and compatible with the materials used inside Orion’s pressurized crew module. This is crucial, as the coolant circulates within the habitable volume where astronauts live and work.
Ammonia, while an excellent heat transfer fluid, is highly toxic and poses significant risks if a leak were to occur inside the crew cabin.
NASA’s safety standards strictly limit the use of hazardous chemicals within habitable areas, making ammonia unsuitable for internal loops.
Instead, ammonia is reserved for external thermal control systems, such as those on the International Space Station (ISS), where any leaks can be isolated from the crew.
Additionally, the glycol-water mixture offers a good balance of thermal performance and freeze protection. It can operate effectively across the wide range of temperatures Orion will encounter, from the cold of deep space to the heat of reentry, without the extreme hazards associated with ammonia.
NASA’s experience with similar fluids on previous missions, like Apollo and the Space Shuttle, provided confidence in the long-term reliability and safety of glycol-water for Orion’s internal ATCS.
Safety First: Crew Health and Toxicity Concerns
When it comes to crewed spaceflight, safety is always the top priority. Ammonia is a powerful coolant, but it’s also a hazardous chemical. Even small leaks can quickly create dangerous conditions inside a spacecraft.
Ammonia exposure can cause severe irritation to the eyes, skin, and respiratory system, and at high concentrations, it can be fatal.
NASA’s toxicology guidelines classify ammonia as a Toxic Hazard Level Four substance, meaning it must be kept out of the habitable volume at all costs.
In contrast, propylene glycol-water mixtures are much safer. Propylene glycol is considered non-toxic at the concentrations used in spacecraft cooling systems, and accidental exposure poses minimal risk to crew health. This makes it a far better choice for a coolant that circulates inside the pressurized crew module.
In the event of a leak, the crew can remain safe and continue operations without the need for immediate evacuation or complex emergency procedures.
NASA’s decision reflects lessons learned from past missions. On the ISS, ammonia is used only in external loops, with multiple barriers and isolation valves to prevent leaks into the crew area.
Even so, ammonia leaks have occurred, requiring urgent spacewalks and careful management to protect the crew.
By choosing glycol-water for Orion’s internal ATCS, NASA eliminates this risk, ensuring that the spacecraft remains a safe haven for astronauts on long-duration missions.
Read Here: How do astronauts cope with 'menu fatigue' inside the Orion spacecraft?
Thermal Performance: Comparing Glycol-Water and Ammonia
Thermal performance is a key factor in selecting a coolant for spacecraft. Ammonia is renowned for its excellent heat transfer properties—it has a high thermal conductivity, low viscosity, and a very low freezing point of -77°C (-107°F). This makes it ideal for external cooling loops exposed to the cold of space, where preventing freezing is critical.
Glycol-water mixtures, while not as thermally efficient as ammonia, still offer good performance for internal loops.
Propylene glycol lowers the freezing point of water, allowing the mixture to remain liquid at temperatures well below zero—typically down to -29°C (-20°F) for a 50/50 mix. This is sufficient for the relatively controlled environment inside the crew module, where temperatures are kept within a comfortable range for the crew and electronics.
The trade-off is that glycol-water has a lower specific heat capacity and higher viscosity than ammonia, meaning it requires slightly more pumping power and larger heat exchangers to achieve the same cooling effect. However, these drawbacks are outweighed by the safety and compatibility benefits.
For Orion, the internal heat loads are manageable with glycol-water, and the system is designed to handle the expected temperature extremes without risking crew health or mission success.
System Architecture: Internal vs. External Loops
Orion’s thermal control system is divided into two main parts: the internal loop and the external loop. The internal loop circulates glycol-water within the pressurized crew module, collecting heat from avionics, batteries, and the cabin environment. This heat is then transferred to the external loop via an interface heat exchanger.
The external loop, managed by the European Service Module (ESM), uses a different coolant—HFE-7200, a low-freezing-point fluid that is also non-toxic but not suitable for direct crew exposure. This fluid carries the heat to the spacecraft’s radiators, where it is rejected to space.
In some mission phases, especially during high heat loads or when the radiators are less effective, Orion can also use an ammonia boiler system for supplemental cooling, but this system is isolated from the crew module and only activated when necessary.
This two-loop architecture is a direct result of NASA’s safety requirements. By keeping hazardous fluids like ammonia or HFE-7200 outside the crewed volume, the risk of toxic exposure is minimized.
The interface heat exchanger acts as a barrier, ensuring that only the safe glycol-water mixture comes into contact with the crew environment. This design also allows for easier maintenance and servicing, as the internal loop can be accessed and managed without special precautions.
Leak Scenarios and Containment: Lessons from ISS and Shuttle
Spacecraft cooling systems must be designed to handle leaks, as even small failures can have serious consequences.
On the ISS, several ammonia leaks have occurred in the external thermal control system, prompting urgent spacewalks to locate and repair the problem.
Ammonia is highly visible when it leaks—forming white “snowflakes” in the vacuum of space—but detecting and containing leaks inside a spacecraft is much more challenging.
If ammonia were used in Orion’s internal loop, a leak could quickly contaminate the crew cabin, forcing the astronauts to don protective gear and potentially evacuate the spacecraft.
The response procedures are complex and time-consuming, and the risk to crew health is significant. In contrast, a glycol-water leak is far less hazardous.
The crew can clean up the spill with minimal risk, and the system can be repaired or isolated without drastic measures.
NASA’s experience with the Space Shuttle and ISS informed the design of Orion’s ATCS. Shuttle used water and Freon in separate loops, with strict isolation between the crewed and uncrewed areas.
The ISS uses water for internal loops and ammonia for external loops, with multiple barriers and isolation valves to prevent cross-contamination.
Orion builds on this heritage, using glycol-water internally and reserving more hazardous fluids for external, unpressurized systems.
Materials Compatibility and Corrosion: Engineering for Longevity
The choice of coolant is closely tied to the materials used in the spacecraft’s plumbing and heat exchangers.
Ammonia is highly corrosive to certain metals, especially copper, zinc, and their alloys. It can also attack aluminum if not properly inhibited. This limits the choice of materials and requires careful selection of coatings and inhibitors to prevent leaks and failures over time.
Glycol-water mixtures are generally less aggressive, but they can still cause corrosion if not properly managed.
Propylene glycol can degrade over time, especially at high temperatures, leading to the formation of acids and other byproducts that can attack aluminum and other metals.
To address this, NASA conducted extensive life tests with different formulations and corrosion inhibitors, ensuring that the chosen mixture would remain stable and compatible with Orion’s aluminum tubing and heat exchangers.
Regular monitoring of pH, conductivity, and corrosion byproducts is part of the maintenance plan for the ATCS.
Filters and biocides are used to prevent the buildup of particulates and microbial growth, which can also contribute to corrosion and system degradation.
By selecting materials and inhibitors that work well together, NASA ensures that Orion’s cooling system will remain reliable throughout the mission.
Microbial Growth and Fluid Longevity: Keeping the System Clean
One challenge with water-based coolants is the potential for microbial growth. Bacteria and fungi can thrive in warm, moist environments, leading to biofilm formation, clogging, and even health risks for the crew.
To prevent this, NASA adds biocides to the glycol-water mixture and designs the system to minimize stagnant areas where microbes could take hold.
Long-duration tests have shown that with proper biocide management and regular monitoring, microbial growth can be kept under control.
The system is also designed for easy servicing, allowing for periodic flushing and replacement of the coolant if necessary.
This approach has been proven on the ISS, where water-based internal loops have operated successfully for years with minimal issues.
Fluid longevity is another consideration. Glycol-water mixtures can degrade over time, especially if exposed to high temperatures or contaminants.
NASA’s testing program includes accelerated aging studies to ensure that the coolant will remain effective for the entire duration of Orion’s missions, which can last several weeks or even months.
By selecting stable formulations and maintaining strict quality control, NASA minimizes the risk of fluid breakdown and system failure.
Radiator Design and Thermal Topping: Managing Heat in Deep Space
Orion’s radiators are a critical part of the thermal control system, responsible for rejecting excess heat to the cold vacuum of space.
The design of the radiators, including their size, coating, and placement, is closely linked to the choice of coolant.
Glycol-water works well with aluminum radiators coated with high-emissivity paints like AZ-93, which are designed to withstand the harsh space environment and efficiently emit heat.
During periods of high heat load, such as reentry or when the spacecraft is exposed to direct sunlight, the radiators may not be able to reject all the excess heat.
In these cases, Orion uses supplemental cooling methods, such as phase change material (PCM) heat exchangers and sublimators, to provide “thermal topping” and prevent overheating.
These systems store or reject heat temporarily, allowing the spacecraft to ride out thermal spikes without risking crew safety or equipment damage.
The combination of glycol-water cooling, advanced radiator coatings, and supplemental thermal management gives Orion the flexibility to handle a wide range of mission scenarios.
The system is designed to operate efficiently in low Earth orbit, lunar orbit, and during the critical phases of launch and reentry, ensuring that the crew and electronics remain within safe temperature limits at all times.
Pumping Power, Viscosity and System Mass: Balancing Efficiency and Complexity
Every coolant has its own physical properties that affect how it moves through the system. Ammonia’s low viscosity means it can be pumped easily with minimal energy, reducing the size and power requirements of the pumps.
Glycol-water mixtures are thicker, requiring more powerful pumps and slightly larger plumbing to achieve the same flow rates. This adds some mass and complexity to the system, but the trade-off is considered acceptable given the safety and compatibility benefits.
NASA’s engineers optimized the design of Orion’s ATCS to minimize these impacts. The pumps are sized to provide reliable flow under all expected conditions, with redundancy to ensure continued operation in the event of a failure.
The system is also designed to be as lightweight as possible, using advanced materials and efficient layouts to keep the overall mass within mission constraints.
The slight increase in pumping power and system mass is more than offset by the reduced risk and increased reliability of using a non-toxic coolant.
For long-duration missions, where maintenance opportunities are limited and crew safety is paramount, this balance is essential.
Single-Phase vs. Two-Phase Systems: Simplicity and Reliability
Thermal control systems can be designed as single-phase or two-phase systems. Single-phase systems, like Orion’s glycol-water loop, keep the coolant in a liquid state at all times, simplifying the design and reducing the risk of leaks or blockages.
Two-phase systems, which use fluids like ammonia that can change from liquid to gas, offer higher heat transfer efficiency but are more complex and harder to manage, especially in microgravity.
NASA chose a single-phase glycol-water system for Orion’s internal loop to maximize reliability and ease of operation.
The system is less sensitive to orientation, pressure changes, and microgravity effects, making it ideal for a crewed spacecraft that must operate flawlessly in a variety of environments.
The external loop, which can tolerate more complexity and risk, uses fluids like HFE-7200 or ammonia to take advantage of their superior thermal properties.
This division of labor allows each part of the system to be optimized for its specific role, ensuring that the crew remains safe and comfortable while the spacecraft efficiently manages its thermal loads.
Ground Servicing and Handling: Practicality Matters
Another important factor in coolant selection is how easy it is to handle, service, and replenish the fluid on the ground and during mission preparation.
Ammonia requires special handling procedures, protective equipment, and strict safety protocols due to its toxicity and volatility.
Any spills or leaks can pose serious risks to ground personnel and require extensive cleanup and decontamination.
Glycol-water mixtures are much easier to manage. They can be handled safely with standard procedures, and any spills can be cleaned up with minimal risk. This simplifies ground operations, reduces turnaround time between missions, and lowers the overall cost and complexity of spacecraft servicing.
For Orion, which must be prepared and launched on tight schedules, this practicality is a significant advantage.
The ability to safely and efficiently service the ATCS on the ground ensures that the spacecraft is always ready for its next mission.
Heritage and Precedents: Building on Past Success
NASA’s choice of glycol-water for Orion’s internal ATCS is rooted in decades of experience with similar systems.
The Apollo spacecraft used an ethylene glycol-water mixture for internal cooling, while the Space Shuttle used water and Freon in separate loops.
The ISS uses water for internal loops and ammonia for external loops, with strict isolation between the two to protect the crew.
These precedents provided valuable lessons in materials compatibility, fluid longevity, microbial control, and system reliability.
By building on this heritage, NASA was able to design a thermal control system for Orion that meets the unique challenges of deep space exploration while minimizing risk and maximizing crew safety.
The collaboration with international partners, such as the European Space Agency (ESA), also influenced the design.
The ESA-provided Service Module uses HFE-7200 for its external loop, interfacing with Orion’s internal glycol-water loop via a heat exchanger.
This approach allows each partner to use the fluids and technologies best suited to their systems, while maintaining overall mission safety and performance.
International Collaboration: ESA Service Module and HFE-7200
Orion’s Service Module, provided by the European Space Agency, brings its own expertise and requirements to the table.
The ESM uses HFE-7200, a low-freezing-point, non-toxic fluid, for its external thermal control loop. This fluid is well-suited to the cold conditions of deep space and is compatible with the materials and systems used in the ESM.
The interface between the ESM’s HFE-7200 loop and Orion’s internal glycol-water loop is managed by a dedicated heat exchanger. This ensures that the two fluids remain separate, preventing any risk of cross-contamination or incompatibility.
The design also allows for efficient heat transfer between the modules, supporting the overall thermal management of the spacecraft.
This international collaboration highlights the importance of flexibility and adaptability in spacecraft design.
By allowing each partner to use the fluids and technologies that best meet their needs, NASA and ESA can work together to achieve mission success while maintaining the highest standards of safety and reliability.
Reliability, Redundancy and Long-Duration Mission Considerations
Reliability is paramount for any crewed spacecraft, especially those venturing far from Earth. Orion’s ATCS is designed with multiple layers of redundancy, including dual pumps, accumulators, and isolation valves.
The system can tolerate the failure of individual components without compromising overall performance or crew safety.
The choice of glycol-water as the internal coolant supports this reliability. The fluid is stable, non-toxic, and easy to monitor, reducing the risk of unexpected failures or hazardous conditions.
Regular maintenance and monitoring ensure that any issues can be detected and addressed before they become critical.
For long-duration missions, such as those planned for lunar orbit or eventual Mars exploration, this reliability is essential.
The crew must be able to trust that their thermal control system will keep them safe and comfortable, no matter what challenges arise.
By choosing a proven, robust coolant and designing the system for maximum redundancy, NASA ensures that Orion is ready for the demands of deep space.
Emergency Procedures and Crew Protection: Planning for the Unexpected
Even with the best design and materials, things can go wrong in space. Orion’s ATCS includes multiple safety features to protect the crew in the event of a leak or system failure.
Isolation valves can quickly shut off sections of the loop, preventing the spread of coolant and allowing the crew to continue operations while repairs are made.
In the unlikely event of a glycol-water leak, the crew can clean up the spill with minimal risk and continue their mission.
If a more hazardous fluid like ammonia were used, the response would be far more complex, potentially requiring evacuation and risking mission failure.
NASA’s emergency procedures are based on extensive testing and experience from previous missions. The crew is trained to respond to a wide range of scenarios, and the spacecraft is equipped with the tools and supplies needed to handle most contingencies.
By choosing a safe, manageable coolant, NASA reduces the likelihood and severity of emergencies, ensuring that the crew can focus on their mission.
Environmental, Regulatory and Safety Standards: Meeting the Highest Bar
NASA’s standards for crewed spacecraft are among the strictest in the world. All materials and fluids used inside the habitable volume must meet rigorous requirements for toxicity, flammability, and compatibility. Ammonia, with its high toxicity and flammability, fails to meet these standards for internal use.
Glycol-water mixtures, especially those based on propylene glycol, are non-toxic, non-flammable, and compatible with a wide range of materials. They meet or exceed all relevant NASA and international standards for crew safety and environmental protection. This compliance is essential for mission approval and international collaboration.
By adhering to these standards, NASA ensures that Orion is not only safe for its crew but also sets a benchmark for future spacecraft. The lessons learned from Orion’s ATCS will inform the design of next-generation vehicles for lunar, Martian, and beyond.
Modeling, Testing and Technology Readiness: Confidence Through Evidence
Before selecting glycol-water as the internal coolant for Orion, NASA conducted extensive modeling, testing, and validation. This included accelerated life tests, materials compatibility studies, microbial growth assessments, and full-scale system simulations.
The results demonstrated that the chosen fluid would perform reliably under all expected mission conditions.
Technology Readiness Level (TRL) assessments confirmed that glycol-water systems were mature and well-understood, with decades of flight heritage on Apollo, Shuttle, and ISS.
The system was tested in both ground and flight environments, ensuring that it would operate as expected in the unique conditions of deep space.
This rigorous approach gives NASA and its partners confidence that Orion’s ATCS will meet the demands of future missions.
The data and experience gained from these tests will also support the development of new technologies and systems for even more ambitious exploration goals.
Efficiency and Heat-Transfer Performance Across Mission Phases
Orion’s missions span a wide range of environments, from the warmth of low Earth orbit to the cold of lunar space and the intense heat of reentry.
The ATCS must perform efficiently in all these conditions, maintaining safe temperatures for the crew and electronics.
Glycol-water provides sufficient heat transfer performance for the internal loop, handling the steady-state and transient heat loads generated by the crew and equipment.
Supplemental systems like PCM heat exchangers and sublimators provide additional capacity during peak loads, ensuring that the system can handle even the most demanding scenarios.
The external loop, using HFE-7200 or ammonia, is optimized for maximum heat rejection to space. The interface heat exchanger ensures efficient transfer of heat from the internal loop, maintaining overall system performance and reliability.
Design Trade-Offs: Crew Health, Thermal Efficiency, Mass and Complexity
Every engineering decision involves trade-offs. In choosing glycol-water over ammonia for Orion’s internal ATCS, NASA prioritized crew health and safety over maximum thermal efficiency.
The slight increase in system mass and pumping power is a small price to pay for the peace of mind that comes with a non-toxic, reliable coolant.
The system is designed to be as simple and robust as possible, minimizing the risk of failures and making maintenance and repair straightforward.
The use of proven materials and technologies reduces development time and cost, while the flexibility to interface with international partners ensures that Orion can support a wide range of missions.
Ultimately, the choice reflects NASA’s commitment to putting crew safety first, while still achieving the performance and reliability needed for deep space exploration.
Conclusion: The Right Fluid for the Right Job
NASA’s decision to use a glycol-water mixture for Orion’s internal Active Thermal Control System was driven by a careful balance of safety, performance, reliability, and practicality.
While ammonia offers superior thermal properties, its toxicity and handling challenges make it unsuitable for use inside a crewed spacecraft.
Glycol-water, with its proven track record, non-toxic nature, and compatibility with spacecraft materials, provides a safe and effective solution for keeping astronauts comfortable and equipment cool on the journey to the Moon and beyond.
By building on decades of experience and leveraging international collaboration, NASA has created a thermal control system that meets the unique demands of deep space exploration.
The lessons learned from Orion will inform the design of future spacecraft, ensuring that the next generation of explorers can venture farther and stay longer, all while staying cool under pressure.
Read Here: How Astronauts Sleep and Eat Inside the Orion Capsule
References
- Ungar, E., & Foley, L. (2018, August). Mitigation of Orion Ammonia Boiler Outlet Coolant Thermal Stratification. Thermal & Fluids Analysis Workshop (TFAWS), NASA Johnson Space Center. Retrieved from https://tfaws.nasa.gov/wp-content/uploads/TFAWS18-AT-15.pdf
- Wang, X.-Y. J., & Yuko, J. R. (2010, August). Thermal Performance of Orion Active Thermal Control System With Seven-Panel Reduced-Curvature Radiator. NASA Technical Reports Server (NTRS). Retrieved from https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/20100040420/downloads/20100040420.pdf
- Westheimer, D. T., & Birur, G. C. (2007, January). Active Thermal Control System Development for Exploration. 45th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit. NASA Technical Reports Server. Retrieved from https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/20070003732/downloads/20070003732.pdf
- NASA. (2015). International Space Station Active Thermal Control System Overview. NASA Facts. Retrieved from https://www.nasa.gov/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/473486main_iss_atcs_overview.pdf
- International Space Station (ISS) Port 1 (P1) External Active Thermal Control System Ammonia Leak. 49th International Conference on Environmental Systems. NASA Technical Reports Server. Retrieved from
- Stephan, R. A. (2010). Thermal Control System Development for Exploration Project. NASA Johnson Space Center. NASA Technical Reports Server. Retrieved from https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/20100021079
- Gilmore, D. G. (2002). Spacecraft Thermal Control Handbook: Volume I, Fundamental Technologies. Aerospace Press. Retrieved from https://arc.aiaa.org/doi/book/10.2514/4.989117
- Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University. (2020). Advances in Spacecraft Thermal Control. ERAU Portfolio. Retrieved from https://portfolio.erau.edu/ws/portalfiles/portal/39826039/Advances%20in%20Spacecraft%20Thermal%20Control.pdf
Read Here: How Orion Capsule Waste Recycling System Differs from the ISS